The map on the following page illustrates the task that faces proliferation monitoring.3 While the list of existing or emerging nuclear nations is not long, the geographic area they cover is large. The emphasis for a non-proliferation regime, therefore, is on greatly expanded global coverage. While certain areas can be identified as especially interesting today - including the Middle East, Pakistan, and North Korea - in the future there are likely to be additional areas of concern.
Remote areas, such as the vast ocean regions in the southern hemisphere, also will need to be monitored in the event that a country attempts to test outside its own geographical borders. From the proliferator's perspective, such tests, even if detected, would have the advantage of being difficult to attribute to a specific nation. From the monitoring perspective, however, oceans have the advantage of allowing for unrestricted access to search for radioactive materials produced by an explosion or other evidence of a test.
| Declared / de Jure | de Facto / Potential | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Israel | Algeria | |
| United Kingdom | India | Syria | |
| France | Pakistan | Brazil | |
| China | S. Africa | Argentina | |
| Russia | N. Korea | Taiwan | |
| Ukraine | Iraq | ||
| Belarus | Iran | ||
| Kazakhstan | Libya |
Return to:Table of Contents
Return to: Chapter II, Lessons from the Past
Continue to:Chapter II, Detecting and Identifying Seismic Events